Political Economy Futures Forum
Research Seminars
The key activities are the PEFF Research Seminars. The seminars build community across the scope of PEFF research and help participants develop excellent research in a collegial environment. We particularly welcome cross-disciplinary contributions from early career researchers and scholars from underrepresented groups. By fostering close connections, the PEFF seminar will, in turn, lead to the development of significant funding bids, especially by developing interdisciplinary capacity to answer targeted thematic funding calls. Responsibility for organizing the seminar rotates across the theme leads. All seminars will run in a hybrid format, to ensure accessibility.
See below for seminar topics & abstracts.
Semester 2, 2025-2026 seminars
1 April 2026 - PGR Session
18 March 2026 - Brokerage and Financialisation in Global Development: UNDP’s Strategic Turn to Private Capital
4 March 2026 - The rise and characteristics of China-led international environmental governance initiatives
26 February 2026 - Rosa Luxemburg and I - a poetic intervention towards post-capitalist climate imaginaries via adaptation of the past
EVENING SEMINAR
Historical figure and socialist revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg, stands as a compelling vector from which to consider liberation of the contemporary self from the current political economy and both psychological and material anthropogenic infrastructures. Engaging Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, I argue that climate inertia and inaction can be viewed as a series of oppressions within and without of the self that require a pedagogic process of critical consciousness for liberation. I demonstrate how creative writing and arts-based research enquiry, can envelop transdisciplinary concerns, employ emotional methodologies, and initiate new mental ecologies that inspire revolutionary impulses via micro-social performance events. Finally, I contend that arts-practice research affords interdisciplinary endeavours a vital space to contemplate new and different kinds of research, alongside new and different kinds of politics. "
18 February 2026 - The role of law in the commodification of land
4 February 2026 - Towards a Typology for Understanding Austerity
The typology developed distinguishes between: (1) austerity defined by scarcity of consumer goods; (2) technical austerity as a macro-fiscal strategy, further divided into austerity during recession and austerity during the ‘boom’; (3) austerity as a political and institutional project linked to neoliberalism; and (4) austerity as a structural and permanent feature of capitalism. By highlighting the varied and often contradictory interpretations of austerity, the paper aims to contribute to heterodox economic debates and inform more effective political responses that challenge its underlying assumptions and distributional consequences.
The paper is part of a wider project that examines the direct impact of austerity on population health, specifically seeking to understand how different approaches to austerity, and countries’ unique experiences of it, lead to differential population health outcomes."
Semester 1, 2025-2026 seminars
12 December 2025 - Environmental data as a relational mediator of contentious publicness: data flows and environmental data activism in China
The paper focuses on a case of data activism initiated to tackle environmental pollution and reduce carbon emissions by The Institute of Public & Environmental Affairs (IPE), an ENGO based in Beijing. Through ethnographic case study, it explores the power relations that shape the material infrastructure and the space for the public to engage in environmental action and the sustainability of their action repertoires. This study sheds light on the material, spatial and temporal dimensions of the activists’ data practices to engage the public in monitoring pollution and carbon emissions.
28 November 2025 - Private Equity, Venture Capital, and the Panama Papers
14 November 2025 - Inventing the Scottish economy
31 October 2025 - Neighbourly Influence: Local Economic Policy Diffusion in relation to Community Wealth Building
17 October 2025 - From Meagre to Mugabe: The Actual and Perceived Impact of the Land Reform Act 2003
10 October 2025 - PGR Session
China’s state capitalist model embeds finance within broader political objectives such as stability, control over capital flows, and the prioritisation of the real economy. These political foundations constrain direct capital-market liberalisation. Under the “One Country, Two Systems” framework, Hong Kong has been deliberately positioned as a politically acceptable intermediary that enables controlled internationalisation of Chinese markets while preserving central oversight. Its market architecture reflects a hybrid model: common law institutions and internationally recognisable regulatory standards coexist with mechanisms specifically designed to channel and restrict access to mainland markets, such as Stock Connect and Bond Connect.
This dual structure allows Hong Kong to perform a transmission function, providing a designed interface through which China engages with global capital markets in a limited and controlled manner. At the same time, the EU relies on Hong Kong as a regulatory gateway to sustain market linkages with the mainland. By analysing case studies under the EU equivalence regime—namely, trading venue access and the recognition of central counterparties—the project demonstrates how Hong Kong mediates between EU influence and China’s regulatory accommodation. In doing so, it highlights the political foundations and institutional architectures that shape financial connectivity across jurisdictions."
Empirically, the research applies this framework to EU water reuse policy and its implementation in agricultural contexts, examining how governance practices may empower or marginalize different actors, from smallholder farmers to migrant labourers. By situating water reuse within the broader political economy of climate adaptation and resource governance, the paper demonstrates how environmental justice struggles are shaped by legal architectures, power relations, and global inequality. This contribution aims to broaden debates on the political economy of environmental infrastructures, showing how justice-oriented analysis can illuminate the hidden distributive and procedural dynamics of climate adaptation policies.
26 September 2025 - Artificial Intelligence and Illegal Markets
This chapter addresses this gap through an interdisciplinary lens, enriching socio-economic research with insights from law and AI studies. It embeds the concepts of ‘AI lifecycle’ and ‘AI value chain’ within a revised theoretical foundation for the study of illegal markets, aiming to inspire future inquiry. Building on this, it examines how AI adoption (i) shifts and blurs the boundaries between legal and illegal markets—proposing a new conceptual framework for understanding AI involvement—and (ii) reconfigures points of tension and ‘interfaces’ where these markets overlap or even converge. The chapter concludes by identifying key challenges for scholars investigating AI-related—including AI-driven—illegal markets, and by emphasizing the urgent need for further research in this rapidly evolving field."